<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Storage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2009-03-27/storage/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2009-03-27/storage</link>
	<description>The personal weblog of Peter Hosey.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 18:26:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hosey</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2009-03-27/storage/comment-page-1#comment-264151</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hosey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 14:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/?p=953#comment-264151</guid>
		<description>Moreover, I computed the volume of the card with the inaccurate depth, so all the numbers after that are wrong. Will fix after breakfast…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moreover, I computed the volume of the card with the inaccurate depth, so all the numbers after that are wrong. Will fix after breakfast…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hosey</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2009-03-27/storage/comment-page-1#comment-264146</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hosey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 14:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/?p=953#comment-264146</guid>
		<description>Robert Rezabek: Oops. Clearly, I forgot to scale that number. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Rezabek: Oops. Clearly, I forgot to scale that number. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Rezabek</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2009-03-27/storage/comment-page-1#comment-264140</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Rezabek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/?p=953#comment-264140</guid>
		<description>The SD card is not 1.0cm but 0.1cm thin. Even more impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SD card is not 1.0cm but 0.1cm thin. Even more impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hosey</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2009-03-27/storage/comment-page-1#comment-259896</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hosey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/?p=953#comment-259896</guid>
		<description>ssp: microSD cards are primarily for mobile phones, so there is no peripheral drive to connect.

As for a PC-only comparison, some PCs have SD slots, but you&#039;d need an SD adapter; I agree with you that even the SD-to-ProFile numbers would be impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ssp: microSD cards are primarily for mobile phones, so there is no peripheral drive to connect.</p>
<p>As for a PC-only comparison, some PCs have SD slots, but you&#8217;d need an SD adapter; I agree with you that even the SD-to-ProFile numbers would be impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssp</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2009-03-27/storage/comment-page-1#comment-259877</link>
		<dc:creator>ssp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/?p=953#comment-259877</guid>
		<description>I\&#039;m sure the numbers will remain mind-boggling even then, but to be fair, the Pro File had the undeniable advantage of actually being usable with you being able to hook it up to a machine, making sure there is power and so on. A fair comparison would just use the size of the drive mechanism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I\&#8217;m sure the numbers will remain mind-boggling even then, but to be fair, the Pro File had the undeniable advantage of actually being usable with you being able to hook it up to a machine, making sure there is power and so on. A fair comparison would just use the size of the drive mechanism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hosey</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2009-03-27/storage/comment-page-1#comment-259837</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hosey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/?p=953#comment-259837</guid>
		<description>Hah. Ryan IM&#039;d me about it. I just now noticed that I have email about it, too. ☺</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah. Ryan IM&#8217;d me about it. I just now noticed that I have email about it, too. ☺</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Schoenberg</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2009-03-27/storage/comment-page-1#comment-259819</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Schoenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/?p=953#comment-259819</guid>
		<description>Hey, that&#039;s a major security problem.. I can apparently run regexps on your posts via the comments! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, that&#8217;s a major security problem.. I can apparently run regexps on your posts via the comments! ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Schoenberg</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2009-03-27/storage/comment-page-1#comment-259817</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Schoenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/?p=953#comment-259817</guid>
		<description>s/to 16 me/to 16 gi/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>s/to 16 me/to 16 gi/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.156 seconds -->

