<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to convert an alpha channel to a mask</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2008-02-18/how-to-convert-an-alpha-channel-to-a-mask/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2008-02-18/how-to-convert-an-alpha-channel-to-a-mask</link>
	<description>The personal weblog of Peter Hosey.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Abdullah</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2008-02-18/how-to-convert-an-alpha-channel-to-a-mask#comment-166669</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Abdullah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2008-02-18/how-to-convert-an-alpha-channel-to-a-mask#comment-166669</guid>
		<description>I would say that those odd pixels along the edge aren't a bug at all, but simply a necessary artifact of the anti-aliasing originally applied to the shape. They do seem to come out OK in the was though at the end fortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that those odd pixels along the edge aren't a bug at all, but simply a necessary artifact of the anti-aliasing originally applied to the shape. They do seem to come out OK in the was though at the end fortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.202 seconds -->
