<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The first working version of Negative Turing Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test</link>
	<description>The personal weblog of Peter Hosey.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TEST</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test#comment-215917</link>
		<dc:creator>TEST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test#comment-215917</guid>
		<description>Neat-o!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat-o!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WHee</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test#comment-215870</link>
		<dc:creator>WHee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test#comment-215870</guid>
		<description>WHOOOOOO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHOOOOOO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pierre</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test#comment-215867</link>
		<dc:creator>pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test#comment-215867</guid>
		<description>nice idea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huoyangao</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test#comment-152426</link>
		<dc:creator>huoyangao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 02:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test#comment-152426</guid>
		<description>...
In Turing Test Two, two players A and B are again being questioned by a human interrogator C. Before A gave out his answer (labeled as aa) to a question, he would also be required to guess how the other player B will answer the same question and this guess is labeled as ab. Similarly B will give her answer (labeled as bb) and her guess of A's answer, ba. The answers aa and ba will be grouped together as group a and similarly bb and ab will be grouped together as group b. The interrogator will be given first the answers as two separate groups and with only the group label (a and b) and without the individual labels (aa, ab, ba and bb). If C cannot tell correctly which of the aa and ba is from player A and which is from player B, B will get a score of one. If C cannot tell which of the bb and ab is from player B and which is from player A, A will get a score of one. All answers (with the individual labels) are then made available to all parties (A, B and C) and then the game continues. At the end of the game, the player who scored more is considered had won the game and is more "intelligent".
...

&lt;a href='http://turing-test-two.com/ttt/TTT.pdf' rel="nofollow"&gt;
http://turing-test-two.com/ttt/TTT.pdf&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>...<br />
In Turing Test Two, two players A and B are again being questioned by a human interrogator C. Before A gave out his answer (labeled as aa) to a question, he would also be required to guess how the other player B will answer the same question and this guess is labeled as ab. Similarly B will give her answer (labeled as bb) and her guess of A's answer, ba. The answers aa and ba will be grouped together as group a and similarly bb and ab will be grouped together as group b. The interrogator will be given first the answers as two separate groups and with only the group label (a and b) and without the individual labels (aa, ab, ba and bb). If C cannot tell correctly which of the aa and ba is from player A and which is from player B, B will get a score of one. If C cannot tell which of the bb and ab is from player B and which is from player A, A will get a score of one. All answers (with the individual labels) are then made available to all parties (A, B and C) and then the game continues. At the end of the game, the player who scored more is considered had won the game and is more "intelligent".<br />
...</p>
<p><a href='http://turing-test-two.com/ttt/TTT.pdf' rel="nofollow"><br />
</a><a href="http://turing-test-two.com/ttt/TTT.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://turing-test-two.com/ttt/TTT.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hosey</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test#comment-5929</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hosey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 05:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test#comment-5929</guid>
		<description>Heh. ☺

Overkill, to my mind, would be anything that incorrectly blocks ham. Anything that consistently defeats the spammers while consistently allowing the real commenters is fair game, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. ☺</p>
<p>Overkill, to my mind, would be anything that incorrectly blocks ham. Anything that consistently defeats the spammers while consistently allowing the real commenters is fair game, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Stevenson</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test#comment-5888</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Stevenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test#comment-5888</guid>
		<description>I do believe this is known as overkill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do believe this is known as overkill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Gibson</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test#comment-5764</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test#comment-5764</guid>
		<description>Seems to be working well. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to be working well. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Johnson</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test#comment-5734</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2007-01-12/the-first-working-version-of-negative-turing-test#comment-5734</guid>
		<description>If the eighth word in this sentence is wrong, then the sentence must be wrong, but that means the eighth word is not wrong, so the sentence is right, but then ...

Oh, just buy the darn viagra!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the eighth word in this sentence is wrong, then the sentence must be wrong, but that means the eighth word is not wrong, so the sentence is right, but then ...</p>
<p>Oh, just buy the darn viagra!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.038 seconds -->
