<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whaaat?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2006-12-06/whaaat/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2006-12-06/whaaat</link>
	<description>The personal weblog of Peter Hosey.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hosey</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2006-12-06/whaaat#comment-4082</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hosey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2006-12-06/whaaat#comment-4082</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="2682"]He published it in 1769, but of course he wasn't born in that year.  Biography.com lists his approximate birthday as 1750 … 1750 + 250 = 2000.[/quote]

So he published it when he was 19. If he was born in 2000, and published it 19 years later, he'd be publishing it in… 2019. On holographic cubes. Like I said. ;)

[quote comment="2682"]And anyway, you're clearly taking the whole article too literally.  The expressions "kicking and screaming", "eye-opener", and "explosive" are common idioms.[/quote]

Yes, I freely admit that I read and write quite literally. The pedantry of the article is totally characteristic of me. ☺</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2006-12-06/whaaat#comment-2682"><p>
He published it in 1769, but of course he wasn't born in that year.  Biography.com lists his approximate birthday as 1750 … 1750 + 250 = 2000.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So he published it when he was 19. If he was born in 2000, and published it 19 years later, he'd be publishing it in… 2019. On holographic cubes. Like I said. ;)</p>
<blockquote cite="http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2006-12-06/whaaat#comment-2682"><p>
And anyway, you're clearly taking the whole article too literally.  The expressions "kicking and screaming", "eye-opener", and "explosive" are common idioms.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, I freely admit that I read and write quite literally. The pedantry of the article is totally characteristic of me. ☺</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Coward</title>
		<link>http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2006-12-06/whaaat#comment-2682</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boredzo.org/blog/archives/2006-12-06/whaaat#comment-2682</guid>
		<description>He published it in 1769, but of course he wasn't born in that year.  Biography.com lists his approximate birthday as 1750:
http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9269182

1750 + 250 = 2000.  And anyway, you're clearly taking the whole article too literally.  The expressions "kicking and screaming", "eye-opener", and "explosive" are common idioms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He published it in 1769, but of course he wasn't born in that year.  Biography.com lists his approximate birthday as 1750:<br />
<a href="http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9269182" rel="nofollow">http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9269182</a></p>
<p>1750 + 250 = 2000.  And anyway, you're clearly taking the whole article too literally.  The expressions "kicking and screaming", "eye-opener", and "explosive" are common idioms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.190 seconds -->
